RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of zirconia and titanium as abutment materials on peri-implant soft tissue color. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The searched electronic databases included MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, and LIVIVO. Two types of studies were included: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that compared zirconia (Zr) and titanium (Ti) abutments. The outcomes measured were as follows: implant crown esthetic index, visual analog scale, esthetic index, gingiva discoloration index-spectrophotometry, papilla index, recession index, and pink esthetic score. Two reviewers selected the records, assessed quality, and extracted data of included studies independently. RESULTS: A total of 323 patients enrolled in 13 studies were included in this analysis with 11 RCTs and 2 CCTs. Due to the wide variety of methodologies used, meta-analysis was only possible for RCTs that performed spectrophotometric analysis. The use of zirconia or titanium for implant abutments does not seem to be the principal factor for influencing peri-implant soft tissue color. The meta-analysis showed no difference between zirconia and titanium abutments. CONCLUSION: This study does not support any better advantage of the use of zirconia in comparison to the use of titanium related to peri-implant tissue color.
